Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot_Flatus
Disagree. Yes, Lack isn't here because he was under-performing, but most importantly had a contract the team was willing to eat. If he had bigger numbers that prohibited him from being waived or demoted, make no mistake, Rittich would still be playing in the AHL.
|
If Lack had a contract that prohibited him from being waived or demoted, I very much doubt Treliving would have traded for him in the first place.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
‘You see in Calgary, [Ryan] Huska is no joke. It’s good. He’s really set on a specific model defensively. If you can be reliable, you have the freedom to play offence.’
—Ethan Wyttenbach
|