Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke
But they already called it 'No-Goal.' Without something concrete (of which there wasnt anything) they're not changing that ruling.
If he just doesnt want his time-out he can give it to me. Maybe he thinks time-outs are a form of cheating and he is morally opposed to them?
|
They called it a goal then reversed without a review
Seems perfectly valid to challenge given that initial confusion
And a fine use of a timeout