No, somebody THOUGHT he was the right pick at that time, but they were wrong. He obviously wasn't because there were several better players taken after him that year. Again that's not debatable at this point based on production. Pastrnak, Larkin, Dal Colle, Nylander... hell there are a lot of them.
Anyway I'm not sure what your point is regardless, he was worth a 4th (or approximately thereto), today he isn't, his value is worse today than even just 1 year ago. Anyway we agree that today you need to hold onto him, but we disagree that they should have sold high previously when his value was higher. That's because ultimately you think his value will increase materially, and I don't think it will to the point that we could have a year ago or so. I think there's a low probability he gets back to that value.
|