The Flames are probably paying those coaches league minimum to coach and in the case of Hartley, not to coach.
I see no evidence outside of paying Darryl Sutter to coach & be the GM, of the Flames paying a premium for their coaches.
I had a personal theory that Flames ownership is willing to open their wallets for players but not coaches and I got an earful from people but I still subscribe to this.
That doesn't mean you can't find a good coach (little experience, rookie, reclamation etc) for a good price but I do get the impression that there is a prevailing thought that coaching isn't as important to ownership as players are.
Last edited by Toonage; 02-01-2018 at 07:00 AM.
|