Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava
I do think it's farcical and outlined my thinking of why that's the case. That's what we do on a message board. I also said that I think it should be taken seriously and investigated, and frankly that seems to be a reasonable position?
I'm not sure what you want here, because it's not like I am shying away from what I said. I just think that it both farcical and should be investigated. I just don't think that I'm some all knowing authority on these things, so while I have my thoughts and opinions I know that I might be wrong.
|
I think the problem is suggesting it's farcical is just as stupid as convicting the guy without any proof. You're right in that you have no idea what happened and it should be investigated. Yet you chose to opine on it without anything backing your claim. Your knowledge of Kent Hehr is utterly meaningless.
You probably mean you think the process is farcical. You'd rather have a closed door, internal, private way to deal with these sort of things that keeps them out of the public eye and lessens the severity of the punishment to what you think fits the crime. AKA status quo.
But you have no right to essentially prohibited from posting whatever they want on Twitter. If this is all just a conspiracy to get rid of some random MP for no reason, then Hehr can sue this living #### out of his false accusers and employers and we'll see a triumphant return to his political career. I'm just not holding my breath as a phenomenon of false accusations hasn't happened yet.