View Single Post
Old 01-30-2018, 02:08 PM   #82
Cowboy89
Franchise Player
 
Cowboy89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iggy_oi View Post
So anyone who is worried about the job market or the lack of competition/available jobs in the telecommunications industry should be considered a poor performer because they would prefer to keep their current job and aren’t wanting to jump all over a severance package? If they didn’t pull their weight relative to their wage why wouldn’t they just be fired?
I spoke in generalities. There likely will be people who are top performers who won't take the package and lower performers who will. Overall though when presented with this option the most confident of getting alternative employment will take the package and generally speaking these are the people with more transferable skills and potentially stronger performers.

With respect to why Shaw didn't just lay off their worst 10% from that group, I agree with you. Probably cheaper while retaining better talent to do just that. If I worked for Shaw, I would actually consider the way they are handling things more benevolent from an employee perspective than the alternative.

Last edited by Cowboy89; 01-30-2018 at 02:12 PM.
Cowboy89 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Cowboy89 For This Useful Post: