View Single Post
Old 01-29-2018, 02:48 PM   #4618
Roughneck
#1 Goaltender
 
Roughneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: the middle
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
Your mic is on, you just happened to miss the entire point. "it", which I assume is CalgaryNEXT may not have been viable economically. But that's based on the City's numbers, not the Flames.
Why should the Flames numbers matter, or be considered? They don't own the land, don't have any experience with reclamation or development, and couldn't even add up their own numbers in their own Plan B proposal.


Quote:
The cleanup has to happen regardless of economic viability of any particular project. It is civic negligence to simply ignore it.
The city has many areas in need of cleanup, including other ones along rivers. . Why should this one be given priority when there is no economic case to do so?
Roughneck is offline