Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz
If the Flames really are willing to sit on their hands for a few years until something changes that seems to be a pretty good indication the Saddledome is still functional enough for them, despite the claims it is not.
|
The words right out of my mouth!
I still dont get why anyone thinks the Flames shouldnt be paying for the entire building costs. Its their business, their profits, why shouldnt they pay for it?
Any other for private business not expected to BUILD & PAY TAXES on their for profit facilities?
Seems an odd position to take that the Flames owners are upset because the city wants them to pay for their building.