View Single Post
Old 01-29-2018, 10:25 AM   #4606
CorsiHockeyLeague
Franchise Player
 
CorsiHockeyLeague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
The cleanup has to happen regardless of economic viability of any particular project. It is civic negligence to simply ignore it.
Regardless of disagreement on any other point, this rings true to me. So the question is how best to go about funding that cost - or at least, taking a big chunk out of it. Could it be the location of infrastructure related to a winter olympics, for which funding could be secured from other levels of government?

I do think people need to stop looking at this from the perspective of "what will cover the costs of cleanup". Probably no project for that area will do that. But the cleanup still has to happen, and delaying increases those costs. So if we're agreed that leaving that area undeveloped indefinitely is not an option, what is the best option to deal with it?
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
CorsiHockeyLeague is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CorsiHockeyLeague For This Useful Post: