Quote:
Originally Posted by Roughneck
NO!
Stop with this. That isn't how it was set up. It has been explained to you multiple times now.
NEXT would be funded by a CRL, which means the property tax from the adjacent zone would be going to fund NEXT, not cleanup.
|
A. There would be associated development in the surrounding area which would be expected. Did you not read the proposal?
B. Part of the NEXT funding was in fact the cleanup. Did you not read the proposal?
Of course, the main dispute was on whether the CRL could cover the cost. Nenshi said it couldn't, King said it could.