Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke
Honestly? If our starting point from Backlund's Camp (assuming Francis isnt pulling this out from where the sun dont shine) then I dont care.
That number or anything near it is perfectly reasonable for Backlund.
If anything I'd consider offering him more per year to get the term down. Backlund is not notoriously durable. But thats insurable within reason so theres that as well.
5X6....okay, a bit long. 5x5? Where do we sign?
|
He was out two months in 2014 with an abdominal injury, but since then I don't think he has missed more than a game the past three seasons. This was once an issue, but I don't know if it now qualifies him as "not durable."