Quote:
Originally Posted by CaramonLS
I'll chime in because I do work in HR. I'm not sure the point you were trying to make by using the term 'sexual misconduct' when you could have just said sexual harassment. It did seem kind of misleading in the way you were using it, regardless of whether you are technically correct or not.
|
Sorry, but what do you mean by this?
Headline: "Trudeau says he will speak to Sport Minister Kent Hehr about sexual misconduct allegations"
I wasn't the one perpetuating its usage, the poster in question was the first to mention it after the article repeatedly made usage of the term. It's clear from the headline and accusation that they were using sexual misconduct as the umbrella term that included sexual harassment, but I don't really know why someone would be confused or why you would take issue with it.