Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague
Did he suggest he thought it was "appropriate", as you say he did? Because it looks to me like he just said that it wasn't "sexual misconduct" of a sort that Hehr should be fired for. Maybe less of the words in other peoples' mouths on this topic would be nice.
|
He literally called it the third reich of language police in defense of it.
If you're saying something to a female coworker due to her appearance that you would never say to a male coworker, yeah that's sexual misconduct dude. I mean, unless you're stupid enough to believe Kent's a cannibal.