Quote:
Originally Posted by corporatejay
I think the problem most people have with him is his base. His vocal base are awful and are composed of MRAs, Red Pillers and racists, but that doesn’t mean reasonable people can’t agree with some of his points.
On the flip side, people are up in arms about this.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...elp-women.html
The headline and conversation seemed to indicate that women were given more time than men. This is false, they just extended the amount of time everyone has. Since these times limits are basically arbitrary and have no correlation to the real world, who the hell cares.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
I'm not saying reasonable people can't agree with him. I'm saying the basic premise of this thread, that somehow he's entitled to a specific amount and type of coverage/platform based on how popular he is, and that somehow the lack of coverage is indicative of some sort of bias is nonsense. There are plenty of legitimate reasons why Peterson doesn't receive acclaim, coverage, etc.