Quote:
Originally Posted by zamler
So if the legislation is so toothless why does it exist.
|
It's not toothless in other contexts of human rights abuses (or perceived abuses). It's just not likely to have any teeth where someone tells you to call them "she", you insist on calling them "he", and they complain that you've violated their human rights. Even if that nonsense somehow made it before the tribunal owing to the tribunals being occasionally insane, and even if it somehow resulted in an order being made for you to call the person "she", you ignoring it is not likely to have much practical consequence even if you didn't want to bother appealing it.