View Single Post
Old 01-05-2018, 09:29 AM   #154
Ducay
Franchise Player
 
Ducay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TorqueDog View Post
Test kits for THC already exist. The problem is applying them properly to a check-stop "is this driver impaired" context, given how long of a detection time THC has in the body, even after the effects have entirely worn off.

If I consume cannabis (any method) before bed at 10:30 PM, and I wake up at 5:30 AM (which I do), I have zero psychoactive effects remaining. But an on-site saliva test (not conducted by a lab) can detect THC for up to 12 hours. It would need to be understood that the mere presence of THC in the saliva is not enough to determine intoxication.

Anyway, as you were.
I agree completely with your argument. My counterpoint would be that the same argument was made with alcohol, but we've forged ahead with both the 0.05 and 0.08 levels regardless of "impairment" level. I'd say the analogy is closer to the 0.05 argument, so I wouldn't be surprised if some THC level is implemented to allow for roadside testing, without having to rely solely on field sobriety tests.
Ducay is offline   Reply With Quote