Quote:
Originally Posted by blender
I don't disagree with you. The comment was basically "who would you rather have" and the answer was an unequivocal vote for Pacioretty.
|
I don't mean this as a slight to you in any way as I have no idea who this was you were listening to... but if it's purely a hypothetical "Who would you rather have Stone or Pacioretty" and paid analysts or media personalities answered Pacioretty... that's madness. I have to think there's some context missing. That's like saying one would rather have James van Riemsdyk over Filip Forsberg. Just a real head-scratcher.