Quote:
Originally Posted by killer_carlson
Cali, he posted actual numbers this year with Brouwer and without.
There is a large difference. Even at a low usage with Brouwer his overall season has been affected.
Please explain the difference in Bennett's numbers with and without Brouwer in another way if you disagree. Because the evidence he presented is compelling that Brouwer is an anchor on Bennett's numbers.
|
It's simple, the quantity of time would not affect his aggregate numbers in any significant way. It's like an outlier data point. The bulk of the data is free of Brouwer, so it's like looking at a trend on a graph and screaming about the outlier way off in the corner.
Again, he's had virtually 0% of his time on ice with Brouwer this year. Last year it was significant, and there was a possible argument there. This year, not so much.