View Single Post
Old 12-22-2017, 11:02 AM   #4398
ken0042
Playboy Mansion Poolboy
 
ken0042's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Close enough to make a beer run during a TV timeout
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
It's pretty clear to me that the Flames don't see a clear path to a profitable deal for a new building.
Actually if the Flames paid $600M on their own for a new arena, just on Flames ticket prices alone they would have recovered the cost in 18 years, and on a 30 year lifespan of an arena be up $484 million. Or about $16M per year over and above what they bring in now.

Never mind concerts, Hitmen, Roughnecks, etc. Then add in parking. Make no mistake about it- with a 100% Flames funded arena they stand to make a boatload of extra money.

That's why I say the Flames are being greedy. They don't want to just make $484M extra in the next 30 years, they want to almost double that. I'm fine with the Flames being profitable. I am not fine with that extra profit coming right out of tax dollars.

Short version of my numbers, current arena holding 19,000 seats at an average price of $100. New arena with 18,000 seats. With Edmonton type increases and extra premium seating, bring the average up to $150 per seat. I did also email Ken King to confirm my numbers, and he danced around the question. I emailed him back to ask again how far off my numbers were; and he didn't reply back the second time.
ken0042 is offline  
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to ken0042 For This Useful Post: