Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
Wait - that answer to a question in an interview is supposed to be part of a "constant threat to move"? I see nothing in that answer that's either aggressive or unfactual. It's pretty clear to me that the Flames don't see a clear path to a profitable deal for a new building. And neither does the City, absent the nebulous value of intangibles, or an Olympic bid. So its entirely possible that no deal is the best deal either side can come up with.
|
I bet both sides will move from their positions, however no clue on the timing....
City has to understand it would be a massive mistake to allow the Flames to relocate....
Flames owners I also believe will move from their position.
Its all about pressure...
As for the comments from the NHL, its obvious the Flames need a new arena....
I just came back from Las Vegas, Arena and location are outstanding...