Quote:
Originally Posted by Parallex
I don't take any issue with any of that both should be paying... but the Flames contention is that while both should be paying only 1 party (them) should be profiting. If both should be paying then both should be profiting and if the flames want a bigger stake in the profits then they ought to pay an equivalent stake in the investment.
How so? Here is the cities response...
https://www.scribd.com/document/3595...ring-proposals
... The cities position seems pretty clear & accurate to me.
You have the role reversed I said it's your neighbor (not you) that get's to drive the car. I'm 99% certain you'd actually tell your neighbor to #### off (after first laughing and then saying "Oh, you're being serious"). If it's that other 1%... could you PM me your address? because I now know who I want to live next to. |
You forgot to add that the neighbour doesn’t have to pay property taxes.
__________________
"9 out of 10 concerns are completely unfounded."
"The first thing that goes when you lose your hands, are your fine motor skills."
|