Quote:
Originally Posted by WhiteTiger
I think that this is the thing most folks have a problem with. The City making it 'right' for these folks would set some interesting precedents for landlord/tenancy issues in the future. After all, if I can put something I own on a landlord's property, and now it's that landlords responsibility to pay for it if they decide to cancel my lease...that opens a huge can on worms on responsibility.
The tenants are out of luck here, as their property is on someone else's property. The person who's property their stuff is not is not obligated to help them get their stuff off it and go. It's their responsibility.
This has dragged on for 8 years too long already. Thank god it's finally over and done with.
|
The city already forced a private developer to move an existing park to put in a Safeway but won't hold themselves to the same standard. These people just want a spot to move to and not have to move from the city they were born and raised in. I don't think that's too much. The bullies in City hall seem to think so though.