Quote:
Originally Posted by Oling_Roachinen
https://www.vox.com/culture/2017/11/...a-ban-blackout
If only Disney wasn't just involved in a controversy where it was banning critics due to "unfair coverage." Kind of gives other some incentive to play nice...
The site had 99% before it got released to the general public and has been going down pretty regular since. If you're naive enough to think the biggest entertainment company isn't going to try and boost its score on a multibillion dollar franchise, I think that's quite hilarious.
The fact that you're trying to act like it's unverifiable fan scores somehow doesn't mean anything though? What? Who cares if they don't have a face for the 150,000 people who voted. What's your argument?
Check Thor: Ragnorak. Even Justice League. The audience score doesn't suggest fans hated those, so why Star Wars...if it wasn't because *gasp* some people just didn't like the movie?!
I thought it was trash. I'm not going to get my panties in a bunch if people liked it. Good for them. But I saw it opening night, saw it when it had 99% audience score and came out of the theatre severely disappointed.
|
I think it's a bad movie, but was entertaining enough. The critic scores are the thing I'm most upset about. Many critics made this out to be some well though out and deep movie, which it clearly wasn't. There were comparisons to the Empire Strikes Back. Instead, it was typical Disney fare.
The fact that Meta Critic critics are given the film a perfect 100 and there is not a single bad review is just baffling. The movie is clearly divisive. Even if you like it, I can't see how you could possibly think it was a perfect movie, deserving a perfect rating.