Quote:
Originally Posted by Cecil Terwilliger
Not to mention you're the one who made the hilarious comment about critics being bought and you're gonna whine that I'm mean for mocking using unverifiable fan scores from the exact same website?
|
https://www.vox.com/culture/2017/11/...a-ban-blackout
If only Disney wasn't just involved in a controversy where it was banning critics due to "unfair coverage." Kind of gives other some incentive to play nice...
The site had 99% before it got released to the general public and has been going down pretty regular since. If you're naive enough to think the biggest entertainment company isn't going to try and boost its score on a multibillion dollar franchise, I think that's quite hilarious.
The fact that you're trying to act like it's unverifiable fan scores somehow doesn't mean anything though? What? Who cares if they don't have a face for the 150,000 people who voted. What's your argument?
Check Thor: Ragnorak. Even Justice League. The audience score doesn't suggest fans
hated those, so why Star Wars...if it wasn't because *gasp* some people just didn't like the movie?!
I thought it was trash. I'm not going to get my panties in a bunch if people liked it. Good for them. But I saw it opening night, saw it when it had 99% audience score and came out of the theatre severely disappointed.
And for what it's worth, I pretty much exclusively use audience score on rotten tomato for newish movies when looking for something to watch. It's pretty accurate.