Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
My understanding is that the Flames would like a 1/3 contribution but without any repayment at all, tax or otherwise.
|
The Flames' offer was the 50/50 offer where most of their 50% was the ticket tax, because that's theirs, while the city considered it a user pay portion.
That aside, the Flames want the city to own it (thus be responsible for it at the end of the lifecycle and all the property taxes) and have their construction contribution act as their lease payment for 100% of revenues.