Quote:
Originally Posted by Suave
So you think McDonalds shouldn’t be held liable for continuing to serve coffee that is considerably hotter then other chains, so hot that it causes third degree burns, and in this case, third degree burns to a ladies genitals that required skin grafts. You think a company that had 700 prior instance of severe burns caused by hot coffee would turn down a temperature a bit. Or they knowingly except the risk of serving it that hot since they think the profit is greater, in which case they should have to pay up when people are severely burned.
|
You can put as much spin on that as you like, but it's still a load of crap lawsuit.
Not a chance in hell McDonalds should be liable for serving hot coffee.