Quote:
Originally Posted by jolinar of malkshor
Or the lady that sued McD's because she spilt her coffee and it was to HOT.
|
So you think McDonalds shouldn’t be held liable for continuing to serve coffee that is considerably hotter then other chains, so hot that it causes third degree burns, and in this case, third degree burns to a ladies genitals that required skin grafts. You think a company that had 700 prior instance of severe burns caused by hot coffee would turn down a temperature a bit. Or they knowingly except the risk of serving it that hot since they think the profit is greater, in which case they should have to pay up when people are severely burned.