I can't recall a game where Gulutzan used a timeout to change the momentum in a game. I'm curious as to whether he likes saving timeouts for video reviews or just doesn't believe in that kind of intervention. I wish the media would ask him that.
In his post game he was asked about the nervousness, how to address it and he said you have to talk about it put it on the table. I guess that means during practice and video - not in game.
I feel like I have to repeat this but I'm not on the fire Gulutzan train. I do want to know what the coach can/will do during games to counter bad situaitons ie tactically or motivationally. Or does he not believe he can do those things in the heat of battle, meaning he needs the video for teaching moments.
Maybe he is a bit too cerebral and he needs a little more visceral in the moment gut action.
I'm upset at the entire organization for:
-not addressing the season long inconsistency
-seemingly not having answers for the problems plaguing the team
-not communicating that here is what's wrong, here's what were doing about it
-overall stubborness
-no damn leadership. no accountability
I don't get the sense that this organization hates to lose. I'm sure they want to win but there is a difference.
|