Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV
Since you do, please enlighten us, and let us know which of those provable top defender qualities it is that Hamonic brings to the table.
Really? How much worse would our second pair be with Kylington instead of Hamonic? We once won a game with an 18 year old Kylington playing with Brodie on our second pair. 20 year old Kylington is a much better player than 18 year old Kylington.
Face it, Hamonic has done nothing that 18 year old Kylington couldn't do, and that's not especially praise of Kylington as I thought he wasn't very good in that game that we won with him on our 2nd pair.
He looks exactly like a #5 defenseman. A possession black hole, with poor gap control, who doesn't bring much offensively, or defensively, but who has a few games sprinkled in between where he's not a liability and passes are hitting him... we've seen that story before, his name was Kris Russell and we didn't pay a 1st + two 2nds for him.
|
My point is - how do you know? How do you know that Kylington would be better then what Hamonic is giving us?
Congratulations, the TEAM won 1 game with Kylington on D. How many games have we won with Harmonic? (it's 14)
It's very easy to talk about prospects that could POTENTIALLY be better then hamonic, but I would argue that there is a reason they are playing in the minors instead of a guy that has over 450 games played