Quote:
Originally Posted by Kybb79
Some of those coaches you mentioned had bad teams actually most of them.
|
Hilarious. I am dying to know which of the seven coaches I mentioned you have ranked ahead of Gulutzan.
Quote:
|
This team in underachieving and that sir is on the coach. This team is stacked on D but can't seem to play like it. This is the best Flames team since 2004 but are lacking a good coach.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JerryUnderscore
...if you look at 5v5, our goals against are 11th...
Looking at the data from Natural Stat Trick, our shots for are 595 while shots against are 593. That's a +2 in the shots differential. (Again this is for 5v5)
As for scoring chances? 579 for, 518 against (that's a 52.78% scoring chance ratio).
What about high danger scoring chances? 214 for, 187 against. Once again that's a 53.37% high danger ratio.
|
The Flames ended the season last year posting a 0.573 winning percentage, and are presently running at a 0.580 winning percentage.
Are they really "underacheiving"? It sure doesn't look like it. In actual fact, I would say they are within range of where they were expected by most to be at the beginning of the season: holding down a playoff spot, and within very close striking distance of the Division lead.