Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner
So you are arguing that Kulak has been better than Stone? I don't think so. Stone has been our third best D man all year Imo and should be playing with Brodie.
|
Stone has been better at getting shots through. In fact with Hamilton/Gio struggling and Brodie possessed by Tanguay, maybe he's been our best D in that regard. Kulak has been better in the D-zone and neutral zone while still having moments in the O-zone.
They're a good pair, and neither deserves to sit. But I do think that overall I have had more positive to say about Kulak than Stone on a game-to-game basis.
Maybe Stone should be playing with Brodie, but
ideally Hamonic finds his game.