Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild GM
The actual hockey results have this team 4 games about .500 which largely meets my expectations so far.
Underlying stats + good record + best players performing well (Brodie aside) is a pretty good combination of indicators.
How are you determining which items are "true indicators" of a well coached team and which ones to dismiss?
|
But if not for Smith this team is barely .500.
And I Look at indicators that have been used for decades. Fancy stats are for nerds
