Quote:
Originally Posted by Red
But they were playing great before GG. Thats the point of me asking. I see players taking a step back with GG at the helm but can't pinpoint any that have improved from previous play.
Maybe a coincidence. But still, when can we say wow, GG made this happen?
So far we have advanced stats. They are clearly better.
But the actual hockey results are underwhelming. Poor special teams, players playing poorly, terrible GF vs GA results. To me those are the true indicators of well coached teams.
|
The actual hockey results have this team 4 games about .500 which largely meets my expectations so far.
Underlying stats + good record + best players performing well (Brodie aside) is a pretty good combination of indicators.
How are you determining which items are "true indicators" of a well coached team and which ones to dismiss?