Quote:
Originally Posted by Red
Many puzzling issues (to some) or roster decisions have been brought up to illustrate Gulutzans "short commings".
What decisions specifically show that he is a good coach?
Outside of just general wins and losses. Because at times good coaches loose and bad ones win.
Team scoring well?
Team defending well?
Good PP? Good PK?
Identity?
Discovered untapped potential in player x or y?
Players playing better than under other coaches?
What contributions can we tie to him directly?
|
How about our top players playing like our top players. A few of them playing like the leagues best players. As much as some people don't like to give the coach credit for good players playing well, it seems just as valid as him getting the blame for the bottom six making mistakes.
Kulak and Jankowski are playing great. I think that could very likely be due to how they have been brought along.
As others have mentioned, From Dec. on last year they played great hockey, including special teams(I think?). Why doesn't he get credit for that?