Quote:
Originally Posted by 81MC
I support victims speaking out, and abusers being ousted, and clearly CK did things that should be reported.
However, the private sexual perversions of someone while they are in a relationship should not be subject to publication. Sure, it speaks to a pattern of behaviour, but the circumstances referenced by L.Silverman are were clearly part of their relationship. A ####ing weird fetish/addiction/perversion whatever, but that's personal and private at that point.
|
Legit question: does the fact that it was a mandatory/compulsory part of their time together, whether she enjoyed it or not (she didn't), change the context enough?