Quote:
Originally Posted by stone hands
Imagine if your firm had 2 different offices, one being successful by most metrics and another being an absolute tire fire. You get the opportunity to expand into a *potentially* lucrative market, but you must relocate one of your existing offices. Why on earth would you move the office that performs well while keeping the failure? Why would you put move yourself from a position of having 1 known good franchise and 1 POTENTIALLY successful franchise to one known bad office and one potentially succesful franchise. it makes absolutely no sense to me, and these guys are by all accounts much more business savvy than i am
|
First of all, you're using extremes, and second, NHL teams are not branch offices, like your argument suggests.