Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Slinger
Aren't "overacheived" and "underacheived" subjective terms and therefore unable to be considered FACT?
|
Technically yes but a reasonable person applying sound logic would conclude those Dallas teams didn't meet expectations and underachieved.
Similarly if i said going into this season that the Flames should give up more goals than they score and end up with 91 points based on their roster and their GM trading the 1st rounder in the summer, any logical person would say that would be a very disappointing season and a definite underachievement. Through 18 games that's exactly what they've been.
The only year that's really debatable is last season but if at the start of the year you told me the Flames would make the playoffs as a wildcard team and get swept in the 1st round, all while suffering very little in the way of significant injuries, i'd still say that was disappointing based on the roster and classify it as a slight underachievement.
No matter how you slice it, none of his teams have over-achieved or come close to it.
So you can nit-pick and drink the kool-aid or bury your head in the sand all you want, but the 234 game sample size doesn't lie...Gulutzan is no good.