Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgaryborn
He's a Paleontologist; Not a social scientist.
What qualifications does he have that makes him better able to interpret statistical data than you or I?
Answer: None!
What motivation would cause him to leave his chosen field and attempt to compile other people's statistical data and make conclusions regarding the effect of Christianity on society?
Answer: He has the same hatred as you do for the Christian faith. Seems to run strong in you atheist types.
Why would Time magazine misrepresent this guys qualifications and publish his research?
Answer: They have had a history of bias against fundamental christianity. Perhaps their editor went to the same journalistic school as Dan Rather.
Why do you keep promoting this guy?
Answer: Because you Believe what he's saying is true.
Did this guy say compare data from China or Japan to that of America? How sure was he that the data was accurate? It's not uncommon to have nations under report violent crime. If you looked at the numbers of domestic abuse cases before 1960 in Canada or the United States you would find very few. That doesn't mean there wasn't a problem. What factor has easily available drugs and weak enforcement of drug laws had on crime in the United States?
Answers: I don't know and neither do you. But that won't matter. You like this guys findings and believe them with all your heart. I mean if you didn't you wouldn't be a positive Atheist. Keep the faith Cheese! Keep the Faith!
|
And your buddy Kent Hovind is what? A brain surgeon?