Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
Part of the decision could well have been about who Huska planned on starting next game. If it was Rittich, he'd probably rather he wasn't travelling more than necessary.
|
Into the second season and it's quite clear that the plan is for Rittch to be back-up or 1b with no more than a third of the starts regardless of stats and results. Would love to hear a reasonable argument otherwise but can't fathom what it would be.
Being too hard on Treliving? Sure, maybe Rittich gets traded before we lose him for nothing but seems pretty clear he's not in the future plans of the club.