Quote:
Originally posted by Displaced Flames fan+Nov 12 2004, 04:52 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Displaced Flames fan @ Nov 12 2004, 04:52 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Flame On@Nov 12 2004, 03:53 PM
But at least it's something they're talking about like it's a human issue, and you're splitting hairs. They're all for gay unions which the republicans won't even talk about.
|
Bush/Cheney both said they were in favor of civil unions for gay couples.
You like to argue based on assumptions and not accurate information. That's twice in this thread. How will you spin it this time? [/b][/quote]
Yawn:
You like to argue based on assumptions and not accurate information. It's not like they've actually put any proposals through that would allow those unions. Coming out a couple of weeks before the election with half assed support for something with no meat to it, doesn't strike me as exactly requiring spin. Ask a gay couple which candidate they feel was elitist, there's your accurate info. Otherwise two weeks before an election is too little too late.
But that's all smoke and mirrors to my main point which is the fact that for the most part republicans want to control with
their agenda. They just call it "values".