View Single Post
Old 11-10-2017, 02:46 PM   #3582
868904
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Demetric View Post
so the leafs looking for D and word is might use Marner as trade chip .... I'm sure we could live without Stone, even if he is a Michael if we are getting a Mitchell back it would keep the M ratio intact.
Probably needed green text, but I think a trade for Marner would involve Dougie Hamilton, and I'm okay with that. I'm getting frustrated with his lack of common and hockey sense.

I think a deal like this would work for both teams:

Marner and Gardiner

for

The Hamilton's and Bennett

Leafs upgrade their defense with Dougie who I'm sure still holds a lot of value despite what I think of him. They get their poor man's Doug Gilmour in Bennett.

Flames take a bit of a perceived downgrade in Gardiner but get a second legit playmaker after Gaudreau.



Gaudreau-Monahan-Jagr
Ferland-Backlund-Frolik
Tkachuk-Janko-Marner
Versteeg-Lazar-Brouwer

Gio-Hamonic
Brodie-Stone
Gardiner-Andersson
Kulak

I think that gives the Flames 3 dangerous scoring lines. The defense "looks" like the top 4 takes a hit, but there is greater overall balance with the 3rd pairing getting an upgrade.
__________________
Calgary Flames, PLEASE GO TO THE NET! AND SHOOT THE PUCK! GENERATING OFFENSE IS NOT DIFFICULT! SKATE HARD, SHOOT HARD, CRASH THE NET HARD!
868904 is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 868904 For This Useful Post: