View Single Post
Old 11-03-2017, 02:40 PM   #313
afc wimbledon
Franchise Player
 
afc wimbledon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: east van
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall View Post
Legally you're wrong on the test of a step parent. Soon Yi was in no way legally Woody Allen's daughter at any point in time. She was also in her 20s when she began her relationship with Allen. Being attracted to a woman in her 20s, who happens to be the adoptive daughter of your wife, is entirely different than wanting intercourse with your own 7 year old daughter. I don't see the link there at all.

I don't even know why I'm participating in this anymore. I don't even like Woody Allen's movies or feel strongly about him in any way. I just think it's probable that he did not molest a 7 year old girl based on:
1. the evidence of Moses Farrow, the supposed victim's brother.
2. the victim's and Mia's contradictory statements.
3. the timing and circumstances of the event.

I also don't know what this has to do with Harvey Weinstein. You are stating because he is a serial rapist, anybody else who you think is creepy is automatically guilty?
No, I'm trying to point out to you that you are choosing to believe the word of a weird creepy bastard with a known sexual interest in his wife's female kids or one of the kids, who, to the best of my knowledge has never accused anyone else of diddling her, I think its a very strange position to take.

And no, the relationship didn't start when the girl was in her 20's, his naked photos of her were found when she was 21, we have no idea when he started shagging her, and as long as he looks after her I doubt she's saying a thing.
Probably applies to the brother as well.
afc wimbledon is offline   Reply With Quote