View Single Post
Old 11-03-2017, 10:56 AM   #291
afc wimbledon
Franchise Player
 
afc wimbledon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: east van
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall View Post
1. Don't lecture me on judge talk.
2. Your commentary on the facts doesn't change them.


https://www.huffingtonpost.com/danny...b_4746866.html

Here's a link with the actual court ruling. The judge basically says there aren't enough facts to decide either way, which is what always happens in a he said/she said scenario.

To clarify a few things:

1. The judge in no way threw out the doctor's report. He said it would be more credible if certain steps were taken. Expert evidence is not meant to displace the trier of facts role, as such, it's extremely common place for a judge to throw out parts of a report or comment on shortfalls.


2. The judge's overall conclusion was that there was not enough evidence to prosecute Allen and that he could not conclusively say that Allen had not groped the child. So pretty much exactly what I said. That only Allen really knows what happened.
Well I think the kid would have a pretty good idea the skinpooch had diddled her
afc wimbledon is offline   Reply With Quote