[Oling_Roachinen]

Originally Posted by blankall

Edit: you are clearly getting your info from this Vanity Fair article: https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.vani...e-10-facts/amp

There are certainly dangers to copying work from secondary sources.

Dude, the link in my post was written by Dylan Farrow herself and has pretty much all the same points (she cites the page you linked):

http://www.cnn.com/2014/02/08/showbi...nse/index.html

Which in turn the facts from Dylan are coming from the court documents themselves. Is there any actual arguments you have with any of the points brought up? Like what a weird argument. Especially if you consider Dylan Farrow and New York Supreme court documents secondary sources.

It's seem like you took Woody Allen's defense as fact, but don't want the disputed information - backed by court documents - to count?