Quote:
Originally Posted by Backlunds_socks
I thanked your post for being a a great example of that mob mentality - while actually denying it.
I've posted the real stats , Wins/Losses and playoff success, or lack thereof. Everything else is conjecture - as hockey games are not science experiments that take place in a vacuum.
|
This is where you keep getting into trouble.
If you want to look at simple wins and losses and make a coaching decision, that's fine. You don't have to look any further, but because you pass on any depth to the analysis certainly doesn't mean others have to join you.
I wouldn't call wins and losses "real" though. I'd call them superficial.
It's akin to someone getting heads three straight times and then announcing to the world that he has coin tossing beat!