Quote:
Originally Posted by octothorp
Idea for change to challenge rule: If something takes 10 seconds to look at and see the the refs made an obvious error, that shouldn't count the same as the sort of super-slow-mo, back and forth, every angle review. So, let's say coaches get two 20-second reviews, and 1 full review. The 20-second reviews are for those 'refs missed something obvious' review, and the full review is for a really hard-to-call play. If you call a 20-second review and command center can't find conclusive reason to overturn it within 20 seconds of looking at film, you lose the challenge. Having a couple additional 20 second reviews a game would not slow it down at all, and it would solve these egregious calls that coaches need to occasionally burn their only challenge on.
|
I think if it requires super-slo mo then it was close enough to to use the call on the field. Replay should only ever be to correct the obvious mistakes.
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
|