No kidding. I'm more than prepared to give up my bump stock if Congress decides to get a grip on reality and view them as a modification to the firing mechanism of the semi-automatic action. As fun as they are, they are a danger to the public IMO. I still content Congress should approach the issue of being able to put rounds down range and make their restrictions based on that need. Civilian need is to get a single round down range (bolt action). Law enforcement have a need to get more rounds down range with a high degree of accuracy (semi-auto). Military has a need to rain lead down range in a spray and pray engagement (auto). Common sense approach to weapon restriction IMO, and complies with the 2nd amendment.
|