Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Slinger
I think there's a case to be made that the Flames should receive public funds. It's debatable how much they actually contribute to the economy and it's also debatable how much they affect the standing of the city around the world.
What I don't think is debatable is that the Flames (and most professional big-league sports teams) bring an intangible element to the city. For instance, the city is transformed during the playoffs, particularly if the team has some success. There is a different vibe and the whole place feels alive.
It's apropos that there has been a debate about public art in the city because I relate professional sports to public art in some ways. They both bring intangible elements to the city that add to the enjoyment of the place by many (not all) of it's citizens. Of course, most public art isn't a for-profit venture but from a citizens perspective they both require a public investment.
I think most of us agree that some form of public funding is appropriate. I think the City offer is just okay but much more reasonable than the Flames offer.
As a hardcore fan of the Flames for the last 27 years I have never been as disappointed in this team as I am right now. I truly think the best option for all involved at this point is for the Flames to sell the team. This would have never happened if Harley Hotchkiss and Doc Seamen were still around.
|
Great post. I think the NHL received some of its best leadership when Harley Hotchkiss was chairman of the Board of Governors. It really is too bad he is no longer with us. He was a man who on the one hand could have reigned in Bettman and on the other been able to have reasonable discussions with Nenshi. Even an ego like Nenshi would have had some respect for Harley. Neither Nenshi nor Edwards have any use for the other.