Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic
It has been noted numerous times already in this thread, but Smith's high dangers and medium danger SP are both considerably better than Elliott's.
|
What? Elliott's Medium Danger SV% is clearly higher than Smith's and the HDSV% is virtually identical. Low Danger is in favor of Smith (but is also considered the least repeatable of the three goalie stats.)
I mean, you could probably cherry pick last year's sample to make it look that way, but... there's a reason that goal based stats like point rates or save percentages are best evaluated with larger multi-season sample sizes.