Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree
It does, actually. You’re forgetting that what is common knowledge on here (that revenue-sharing receiver does not equal financially struggling), is not common knowledge to the average fan and certainly not to non-fans.
There’s no bias, why would there be? What does the writer care? The fact is that King was specifically trying to portray the Flames in a particular way using a fact that, in reference to their economic viability, is actually completely meaningless and stupid to bring up.
Also, try reading the article past the headline. It’s spot on.
|
Article is fine, but the headline is BS and they should change it. A lot of people are against giving any money to private business for any reason, so obviously bias can be a factor.